October 1, 2005 To establish a uniform procedure for the control, development, modification, and approval of all official Departmental forms for which the Atlanta Police Department is the proponent agency. Forms developed for use within a division or section, are approved at the division or section level.

  [ Administration ]  [ Personnel ]  [ General Operations ]  [ Field Operations ]  [ Criminal Investigations
[ Support Operations ]  [ Special Orders ]  [ Command Memo ]  [ Library ]  [ Search ]  [ Home ]

 

Atlanta Police Department

Special Enforcement Section

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section Command

Memorandum

 

Effective Date

December 6, 2004

 

APD.CM.04.108

Intelligence Organized Crime Unit

 

Applicable To: Bureau, Division, Section commanders and Intelligence Organized Crime Unit employees

Approval Authority:  Major J.E. Sellers

Signature:  Signed by JES

Date Signed:  12/6/2004

 

  Table of Contents    
 

1.        PURPOSE  PAGEREF _Toc90100127 \h 1

2.        POLICY   PAGEREF _Toc90100128 \h 1

3.        RESPONSIBILITIES  PAGEREF _Toc90100129 \h 1

4.        ACTION  PAGEREF _Toc90100130 \h 1

4.1.1    Procedures  PAGEREF _Toc90100131 \h 1

4.1.2    Types of Intelligence Information  PAGEREF _Toc90100132 \h 2

4.1.3    Quality of Intelligence Information  PAGEREF _Toc90100133 \h 2

 

4.2      Purging of Out-of-Date or Incorrect Information  PAGEREF _Toc90100134 \h 2

4.2.1    File Retention Officer will: PAGEREF _Toc90100135 \h 2

4.2.2    Unit Supervisor will: PAGEREF _Toc90100136 \h 3

4.3      Case Assignment and Review: PAGEREF _Toc90100137 \h 3

4.4      Training  PAGEREF _Toc90100138 \h 3

5.        DEFINITIONS  PAGEREF _Toc90100139 \h 4

6.        CANCELLATIONS  PAGEREF _Toc90100140 \h 4

7.        REFERENCES  PAGEREF _Toc90100141 \h 4

 

1.               PURPOSE

 

The intent of this directive is to establish procedures that ensure the legality and integrity of the Intelligence/Organized Crime Unit’s operations.

 

2.               POLICY

 

The Atlanta Police Department will conduct investigations on individuals or groups who present a bona fide threat to the community and who are engaged in criminal activity. Nothing in this directive should be interpreted as permitting the collection of data for political or other purposes unrelated to crime.

 

3.               RESPONSIBILITIES

 

3.1              Supervisors will be responsible for monitoring the compliance of this directive.

 

3.2              Investigators will ensure that all investigations involve criminal activity and/or an immediate threat to the community

 

4.               ACTION

 

4.1              Collecting Intelligence Data (CALEA 51.1.1a)

 

4.1.1           Procedures  [ Return to Top ]

 

1.    Verify that a legitimate reason exists for collecting information. (i.e., probable
       cause or reasonable articulable suspicion (RAS)

 

2.    Verify that information collected is related to a criminal act or other activity that

       present a threat to the community.

 

3.    Verify the validity of the source of the information.

 

4.    Monitor, review, and verify the reliability of the information.

 

5.    Supervisors will monitor and review investigative case files to ensure compliance

       with City, State and Federal laws, and Departmental policies.

 

4.1.2           Types of Intelligence Information  [ Return to Top ]

(CALEA 51.1.1b)

 

1.    Raw Data: Information obtained from various sources, sometimes fragmentary or

       unsubstantiated, which may suggest possible criminal activity.

 

2.    Significant Intelligence: Has obvious value and may justify further inquiry and/or the

       initiation of a formal criminal investigation.

 

3.    Strategic Intelligence: Information indicating that a situation may involve illegal

       activity that could require lengthy investigations and such that cross jurisdictional

       lines, (i.e., city, state, and domestic borders.

 

4.    Tactical Intelligence: Information of a localized nature, indicating that criminal

       activity is in a specific area, usually within a specific area.

 

4.1.3           Quality of Intelligence Information  [ Return to Top ]

(CALEA 51.1.1b)

 

1.    Completely Reliable: Information source has proven to be competent and

       trustworthy.

 

2.    Usually Reliable: The source has been credible more times than not.

 

3.    Fairly Reliable: The source of information has had a history of being reliable on

       occasions.

 

4.    Not Usually Reliable: The source cannot be relied upon for credible information.

 

5.    Cannot Be Judged: The source of information has not established a reliability

       history with the Intelligence Unit or other APD investigator.

 

4.2              Purging of Out-of-Date or Incorrect Information

(CALEA 51.1.1c)

 

4.2.1           File Retention Officer will:  [ Return to Top ]

 

1.    Ensure that all intelligence files assigned to investigators are entered into the Unit

       database, and case updates are filed in the master file located appropriately in the

       Master File Room. 

 

2.    Be responsible for removing any incorrect information in the file and destroying it.  

       The File Retention Officer will shred all files classified sensitive intelligence

       information accordingly.

 

3.    Inspect the Master File room annually and prepare any inactive files that are five (5)

       years or more for purging.  The Unit supervisor will inspect files prepared for purging

       and initial the authorization form to archive the file or destroy it. 

 

4.    Packaging and proper labeling of files to be destroyed or archived.  The FRO will

       contact the appropriate official to arrange delivery of purged files.

 

4.2.2           Unit Supervisor will:  [ Return to Top ]

 

1.    Oversee and monitor the proper purging of Intelligence Unit files by routinely

       inspecting the file room and examining file drawers.

 

2.    Ensure that the File Retention Officer makes the appropriate updates to the

       database and to the master file when files are suspended or corrected data is

       entered in the file.

 

4.2.3           A copy of all file retention forms for purged files will be kept in the unit for three (3) years.

 

4.3              Case Assignment and Review:  [ Return to Top ]

 

4.3.1           All reports of actual or suspected criminal activity, intelligence leads, anonymous tips and other information received in the unit, will be initially reviewed by the Unit supervisor or commander. 

 

4.3.2           If preliminary review reveals sufficient data to suggest the possibility of criminal activity or a threat to the community, the supervisor will assign the intelligence report to an investigator for further processing. 

 

4.3.3           Investigators will provide a weekly report of the investigations progress, specifically outlining the elements of the investigation, which supports and characterizes the suspected criminal activity.  Supervisors will review this report weekly and make recommendations accordingly.

 

4.3.4           If after a reasonable period of the investigation, the supervisor cannot determine the scope or legitimacy of the investigation, the investigation will be suspended.  The file will then be entered into the master file room and categorized “Suspended.”

 

4.3.5           If additional information is received to justify the reactivation of suspended files, the Unit supervisor may reassign the case utilizing the aforementioned procedure.

 

4.4              Training  [ Return to Top ]

 

4.4.1           Investigators assigned to the Intelligence Unit will submit to ongoing training in the area of intelligence gathering, dissemination, and analysis.  They will likewise receive training regarding the legal issues surrounding intelligence investigations and the legal use of surveillance equipment.  All new investigators will attend the appropriate basic intelligence investigations course.

 

4.4.2           The Unit Training Coordinator will ensure that all investigators and supervisors receive refresher and advanced training courses annually.

 

5.               DEFINITIONS

 

5.1              Direct report subordinates:  The subordinates who report directly to a supervisor.

 

6.               CANCELLATIONS

     

N/A
     

7.               REFERENCES

 

N/A